
It makes you stop and realize just how quickly things are happening, how quickly the technology is changing.
Here are a few of 'The Rules' that occurred to me one evening after being online a while. They apply to EVERYONE--young, old, closeted, out, etc, etc.... >>>1. Make up at least a short profile and put something informative in it(!) If you put next to nothing in your profile, as in you don't say WHY you're on here/WHAT you're looking for, then people don't know how to approach you. (If to that you say "good", you're a loser and why are you even on here in the first place if you're that anti-social?) >>>2. If you have preferences re: what TYPE and AGE of guys you want messaging you SAY SO IN YOUR DAMN PROFILE!! If you only like guys within 2 weeks of your own age, then SAY SO. And, if you have strong likes/dislikes for thin/muscular/fat/hairy/ or smooth guys, say that too. Then at least if someone messages you who isn't your type, it's his own fault for not bothering to read your profile. If you DON'T state your type/age range, then the assumption is that you're willing to do whatever you normally would (chat with/meet/hook up with, or whatever) with whomever takes the initiative to pvt. you regardless of how old or young or how heavy/skinny they are. Think about it! Don't assume anyone can read your mind--everyone's different in their tastes. >>>3. READ a person's profile before you pvt. them! This assures you know at least the basics about the person you want to chat with. You might not remember everything you just read, but at least you won't message someone who's paradigmatically your opposite. >>>4. DON'T act all interested in someone one day and ignore him the next. If someone first messages you who you're not interested in, then just tell him you're busy, or not interested or whatever. Don't act like he's your long lost love on Monday, and your worst enemy on Tuesday. Oh---and a footnote----> If you think this is too negative, you either didn't read it very carefully, or it must apply to you. Get over yourself.Note the first thing that leaps out at you: anger and frustration. Many average-to-unhealthy (or stressed-out) Ones give off that kind of energy. Note also, the issuance of "The Rules", or what they insist is the best or only way to go about doing something.
Isn't the whole message of this thing that you can be different and not be inferior? That you shouldn't care about how other people care about you? ...I will STOP comparing myself with other people, how they look, what they wear, who they're with. If I keep rating myself by externals rather than internals, I'm just buying into the trap. It's better for me to be true to myself where I am, as I am, rather than squeeze myself into someone else's idea of what's acceptable, what's desirable. ...I don't feel like I belong at this festival because I'm comparing myself to other people and thinking that I am inferior, because I don't "look right" or "act right"—how stupid.
I chatted with Geek Slut* last night over AIM, and he LOL-ed heartily when I told him my boyfriend and I are engaged in a three-month (and counting) monogamous relationship. According to Mr. Slut, I'll be reconsidering this whole monogamy thing within a year. He said that if I'm uncomfortable with the idea of my boyfriend fucking other boys, then our relationship is based entirely on sex and, subsequently, is doomed.This, from a man who considers a serious relationship one in which he's been fucking the same guy for two weeks in a row.Let's get this straight: I don't appreciate being told that the best I can hope for in life is a string of meaningless sexual encounters. I respect anyone's choice to have an open relationship with his boyfriend or no relationship at all, so please respect mine. It's not my fault I was born into a generation that thinks being gay is OK, that doesn't try to mask sexuality with sex, that isn't afraid to find love.If you think this entry is a knee-jerk rant derivative of my repressed fear of sexual wanting, then think about why you're so opposed to the so-called "hetero" lifestyle I hope to live. Perhaps we're both afraid, just of different things.
"The freshman class of 2003 grew up with computers, multimedia, the Internet and a wired world. Twenty percent of them began using computers between the ages of 5 and 8. By the time they were 16-18 all of them had begun using computers. Their world is a seamless "infosphere" where the boundaries between work, play and study are gone. Computers are not technology and multitasking is a way of life. This generation of young adults mixes work and social activities, and the lines between workplace and home are blurred. The compartmentalization of leisure activities from work activities that their parents still mostly adhere to is largely unknown to the current group of college students."
The second one is eudaemonia, the good life, which is what Thomas Jefferson and Aristotle meant by the pursuit of happiness. They did not mean smiling a lot and giggling. Aristotle talks about the pleasures of contemplation and the pleasures of good conversation. Aristotle is not talking about raw feeling, about thrills, about orgasms. Aristotle is talking about what Mike Csikszentmihalyi works on, and that is, when one has a good conversation, when one contemplates well. When one is in eudaemonia, time stops. You feel completely at home. Self-consciousness is blocked. You're one with the music.The good life consists of the roots that lead to flow. It consists of first knowing what your signature strengths are and then recrafting your life to use them more—recrafting your work, your romance, your friendships, your leisure, and your parenting to deploy the things you're best at. What you get out of that is not the propensity to giggle a lot; what you get is flow, and the more you deploy your highest strengths the more flow you get in life.Coming out this month as part of the DSM is a classification of strengths and virtues; it's the opposite of the classification of the insanities. When we look we see that there are six virtues, which we find endorsed across cultures, and these break down into 24 strengths. The six virtues that we find are non-arbitrary—first, a wisdom and knowledge cluster; second, a courage cluster; third, virtues like love and humanity; fourth, a justice cluster; fifth a temperance, moderation cluster; and sixth a spirituality, transcendence cluster. We sent people up to northern Greenland, and down to the Masai, and are involved in a 70-nation study in which we look at the ubiquity of these. Indeed, we're beginning to have the view that those six virtues are just as much a part of human nature as walking on two feet are.